Information is created to deliver a message. Every day, we receive different types of messages, in various formats. This chapter will provide an overview of these messages, their purposes, and how they are packaged.

SHORT FORMATS

Some of the messages we receive are short and intended to convey an idea or reaction through a word a few words, or an image. Short formats include lapel pins, mottos, slogans, logos, brands, X posts, artifacts, banners, or billboards.

A logo is intended to get people to associate an image with a company or brand. If a logo is successful, consumer recognition will become automatic. For example, when one sees the yellow double arches, one thinks of McDonald’s. The white apple symbol is associated with Apple Computers, and the “swoosh” is associated with Nike products. A motto or slogan is intended to make a statement of belief or expectation but can conjure images in people’s minds. For example, McDonald’s uses the motto “I’m lovin’ it,” and KFC uses the motto “Finger Lickin’ Good.” Others, such as Ford’s “Quality is Job One” or IBM’s “Think” send a message to company employees and consumers.

Another type of short format information can be found on X, an electronic messaging service that allows users to send short messages called posts to their followers — other users who subscribe to receive their posts. The purpose of a post is to quickly send a brief message to a select group of people. This type of message is not very detailed (280 characters or less) but is meant to provide brief information, updates, or promote awareness.

Artifacts are physical things that people use for research, like fossils, furniture, coins, plant or animal specimens, tools, and clothing. Others include works of art (e.g., paintings or sculpture), architecture (e.g., buildings), or musical instruments.

LONG FORMATS

Long format options are used when one needs to convey more information than is possible in an X post or a motto. Examples include books, newspapers, magazines, journals, blogs, websites, and webpages.

BOOKS

Books have been around for centuries, and formats include print, electronic, and audiobooks. They can be found in library databases, online search engines, physical and online stores like Barnes and Noble or Amazon.com, and websites like Project Gutenberg. Books are cited differently, depending on where you find them and how much of them you are using (e.g., the whole book or a single chapter).

Typically, books take several years to create and are not published on a regular schedule. Scholarly books often require a proposal, research, synthesis, and editing before publishing. They typically contain extensive bibliographies which provide additional sources of information. On the other hand, popular books can be rushed into publication because they aren’t carefully researched and represent a quick profit (such as unauthorized celebrity biographies). While they might be good sources for topic ideas, they are usually ill-suited for most research topics.

Books are great for a broad overview of a topic and are more comprehensive in their coverage. Because of their length, they can explore more aspects of an issue in greater detail. One disadvantage of books is that they are not a good source for current events since they take so long to be published. Also, because of their length, they typically take significantly longer to read than articles.

PERIODICALS

Newspapers are designed to provide current news, and may be found in print, library databases, or the Web. Newspapers make up some of the category of sources called periodicals, as they are published periodically, such as daily, weekly, or biweekly. Some are broad-based sources of information, while others are specialized, providing news of a particular geographic locale, political party, or subject category. They are typically good sources for local interest issues. The content found in newspapers is written by reporters or journalists.

Magazines are similar because they are periodical publications written for the general public. Some are more news-focused, and some are entertainment-focused. Both newspapers and magazines are controlled by organizations, usually for-profit, that produce the information for the general public or for specific groups of people. The organization hires people to write and publish the information according to specific standards set by the organization for content and style; information is filtered and selected by the organization. The quality of these publications varies from poor (sensational magazines like National Enquirer) to substantive sources, such as The Economist.

Scholarly journals are written by experts in specific fields, targeting a particular discipline. Many — but not all — are peer-reviewed, meaning other experts in the field review the articles before they are published. Scholarly journals are also periodical publications, typically published less frequently than newspapers or magazines, so they are not the best format for current information. The language is customarily very dense and difficult to understand unless you are a scholar or expert in that field. They are often extremely expensive. Bonnie Swoger (2012), a Science and Technology Librarian at a small public undergraduate institution in upstate New York, published a blog that discussed a library session for biology students where she noted that “You can get a year of People for just $100, or a year of Scientific American for only $25… [but] a library subscription to the Journal of Coordination Chemistry (24 issues per year) costs $11,367 per year” (para. 3). The expense of these publications limits access for many people, which is paving the way for the open-access movement, discussed in Chapter 7: Using Information Ethically.

BROCHURES

While a brochure would appear to fit into the “short format” category, it delivers more information than could be contained in a logo or an X post. Consider the information you might find in a travel brochure to visit a foreign country. There could be information on weather, safety, transportation, leisure activities, culture, cuisine, hotels, car rental, pictures of tourist destinations, etc. While much shorter than a travel book, there is enough information presented in this small source to give people a good idea of whether they might want to travel there. While some brochures are informative, others are designed to sell or advertise.

BLOGS

A blog, or weblog, is found on the Web and usually provides commentary on a specific topic, though some more closely resemble diaries. Blog posts are typically displayed in reverse chronological order. Most are published by individuals, though “multi-author blogs” (MAB) have become more popular. These are often written and edited by news outlets, advocacy groups, educational institutions, think tanks, etc. Many blog entries include text, images, and links to other sources, and readers can publicly comment on their content. Social news sites, such as Reddit, allow readers to interact by voting for articles and commenting on them.

WIKIS

Wikis differ from blogs in that they allow users to change the content of the wiki pages, not just to post comments about the content. Wikis such as Wikipedia can be publicly accessed and edited by any user. However, wiki software can also support more private collaboration projects, where only group members can see and edit the wiki content. Most wikis are a bit like a user-created and user-edited encyclopedia, where the content may be general, such as Wikipedia, or subject-specific, like the Pokémon Wiki, which focuses on information about the imaginary creature of Pokémon.

WEBPAGES/WEBSITES

Most people have used the Web for research at one time or another. One of its strengths is the ability to explore a particular topic by clicking links from one webpage to another, or from website to website. The Web often provides immediate access to breaking stories that will normally take a day to appear in newspapers. In addition, it provides information and coverage on almost any topic, through various perspectives.

The quality of the information you find on the Web varies widely, and it can be challenging to verify the credibility of a particular site. In addition, the Web is inorganized; pages may not be archived or preserved, and what you find today might not be there tomorrow. Many pages include advertising which can lead to bias, and some information on the Web may require a subscription or fee to access.

When you use Google or another search engine, you will typically receive results that include a combination of websites and webpages. A website typically consists of multiple related pages organized by content or purpose. These pages can generally be found on the website’s home page through menus or links. For example, the home page of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke allows you to search for a specific topic related to neurological disorders such as epilepsy. You can search their A to Z index of disorders or use the provided links to access specific pages.

On occasion, it may be appropriate to cite an entire website; however, you generally want to use the most specific information for research, making webpages the most common point of reference. Using the previous example, instead of citing the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke website: https://www.ninds.nih.gov, you would cite their Epilepsy page: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/All-Disorders/Epilepsy-Information-Page. One way to distinguish between websites and webpages is to think of websites as a book, with webpages being pages in that book.

REFERENCE SOURCES

Consider reference sources as sources you refer to rather than read cover to cover — hence the name “reference.” These sources generally summarize topics or assist in finding secondary literature. Their purpose is to provide background information, short answers to simple questions, or to help you find other sources. They are also great for quick facts, statistics, or contact information, and can be useful for learning specific vocabulary. Many contain great bibliographies for further reading or additional sources on your topic.

In short, they can be a great starting point for research. After reading about a topic in an encyclopedia or other reference source, you should have a better idea of how to focus your topic and where to look for further information.
Most print reference sources cannot be checked out from the library. However, online reference sources are available on the library’s website and can be accessed from off campus, though some require that you be affiliated with the university. Below is a list of the most common types of reference sources, with examples:

Dictionaries define words and illustrate pronunciation. They are also used to find out how words are utilized, help locate synonyms and antonyms, and trace the origin of words. Examples of general dictionaries include Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary and the Oxford English Dictionary. Examples of subject-specific dictionaries include the Dictionary of Music Education and the Dictionary of Soil Science. An online example is the Dictionary of Slang.

Bibliographies provide lists of literature on a specific subject or works by a particular author. One example is the Bibliography of American Literature.

Concordances are alphabetical listings of keywords or phrases found in the work of an author or work in a collection of writings. Examples include the Concordance of Federal Legislation and the Topical Bible Concordance.

Biographies are sources of information about a person’s life. Examples are the Twentieth-Century British Humorists and Who’s Who in America. An example of an online biographical reference source is Biography.com.

Almanacs are typically single-volume works with a compilation of specific facts and statistics. Examples include The World Almanac, Book of Facts, and Information Please Almanac. Information Please is also available online.

Directories list contact information for individuals, companies, organizations, and institutions. Examples include the Directory of Corporate Affiliations and the Encyclopedia of Associations.

Encyclopedias cover topics in a comprehensive, but concise fashion. They are useful for providing facts and a broad survey of a topic, often written by specialists. While encyclopedias are good for background information, and to lay the groundwork for understanding a topic, they are not typically cited as sources in a college-level research paper. If students want to use encyclopedias, they should use specialized encyclopedias that go more in-depth. Examples include general encyclopedias, such as the World Book Encyclopedia or Encyclopedia.com, and subject-specific encyclopedias, such as the Encyclopedia of Education or the Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Education.

Manuals provide “how to” information, such as how to write a correct citation. An example is the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th Edition.

Handbooks provide a concise overview of single topic, including directions and examples. Examples include the Handbook of American Popular Culture and the Business Plans Handbook.

Guidebooks provide detailed descriptions of places, intended for travelers. They often include both maps and geographical facts. One example is this historic Guidebook of the Western United States.

Atlases are books of maps and geographical information — not just maps showing how to get from A to B, but also maps that show climate, crops, population, etc. Examples include the World Atlas of Military History and Atlas of the Great Plains. The Census Atlas of the United States is available online.

Gazetteers are dictionaries of geographical places. Examples include the Historical Gazetteer of the United States and the Utah Atlas & Gazetteer.

CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS/RESEARCH REPORTS

Researchers present papers and research reports at conferences to describe their current research. These papers are often published in a volume called a conference proceeding. While this information can be published in scholarly journals, the process can take months. Sometimes proceedings are treated like individual books, while yearly conferences are treated like journals. So, instead of a single record for each conference, there is a single record (usually in the library catalog) for all the years of that conference’s proceedings. Sometimes conference papers are not published and may only be available from the authors, which makes them difficult to find.

MULTI-FORMAT INFORMATION

Much of the information available today is available in multiple formats. Books are the most obvious example of multi-format information. A single book can be published in print, as an audiobook, or made available electronically through library databases, the free Web, or via Kindle or Nook. Similarly, articles are available in print, via a subscription library database, or the free Web. However, sometimes, the version you find for free can be different than the one offered through a subscription service.

One of the advantages of multi-format sources is that users can choose their preferred method of viewing. For example, this textbook, available for free on the Stewart Library website, can be downloaded in PDF format and viewed on a large-screen computer, tablet, or phone. Readers may print sections or check out a bound copy from the library’s Reserve collection. While some like the feel of an actual print book, others prefer to read online; some online readers are comfortable reading on a small screen, while others prefer to sit in front of a large monitor to view the content.

AUDIO-VISUAL FORMATS

Audio-visual formats include videos, online games, documentaries, speeches, songs, movies, plays, photographs, paintings, pictures or illustrations, and numerical information in charts, graphs, diagrams, word clouds, tables, or infographics. Visual information can tell a story, explain a concept, or stimulate an emotion. Social media and photo- and video-sharing websites, like YouTube, Flickr, and Vimeo, allow viewers to interact by sharing photos or videos and commenting on user submissions. As with all information, it is essential to consider the information’s source and cite these sources when you use them.

Visual information does have some caveats. First, people may see different things when viewing images. Critical pieces of the image could be ignored or missed, and people with different backgrounds and experiences may have different perspectives. Second, images will sometimes appear very different depending on whether they are viewed in person, in a high-quality print publication, on a computer, or on a small device such as a cell phone. In other words, different devices can change the message. Third, statistics presented in visual form, such as charts, graphs, or infographics, can distort or misrepresent what the numbers are telling you. Sometimes this is deliberate, and sometimes people don’t understand the data. For example, a vertical scale can be too big or too small, skip numbers, or not start at zero. Other times the graph is incorrectly labeled, or data is left out.

Look at these two graphs. Though the numbers are the same (X=75, Y=58, Z=54), the way each graph presents them makes a very different impression. The chart on the right implies that X is three times as great as Y, and nearly six times as great as Z. However, note that the vertical axis of the chart starts at 50 and goes up by increments of 4, making X, Y, and Z look farther apart. On the other hand, the vertical axis of the chart on the left starts at 0, and rises by increments of 20, more accurately depicting the relationship between X, Y, and Z.

INFORMATION TYPES

Sometimes, when given an assignment, you must use a specific source type. The previous section discussed formats of information, which tell you what it is (a book, article, webpage, blog, etc.). This section discusses types of sources and describes what kinds of sources they are.

PRIMARY & SECONDARY

At some point you may have a professor who requires you to find primary research articles. How can you know if you’ve found the right kind of source for the assignment? Think of primary sources as first-hand accounts or reports written by the person or people who experienced the event. A primary research article will be one in which the authors of the article are the same people who conducted the research, analyzed the results, formed conclusions, and reported their findings and methodology in the article. Primary sources may also include diaries and journals, autobiographies, case studies, memos, photographs, fiction novels, and eyewitness newspaper articles written at the time of the reported event.

Secondary sources review and summarize the research conducted by others. Articles in which the authors study and analyze past events they did not experience are also considered secondary sources. Other secondary sources include encyclopedia articles, biographies written by someone other than the subject, scientific literature reviews, and textbooks.

SCHOLARLY, POPULAR, & TRADE

For college-level work, you will often be required to use academic scholarly sources, though sometimes it might be okay to use popular sources or trade publications. While general characteristics can distinguish each source type from another (see below), it is important to remember that many sources will not match all the characteristics of a particular source type. For example, Scientific American has glossy pages and color pictures but includes scholarly articles and those geared toward a more general audience. The American Journal of Nursing is a glossy trade publication that includes both popular and scholarly articles written for those in the nursing profession.

It is important to point out that the following table is focused primarily on articles. Other formats like books, videos, and websites, may be classified as scholarly, popular, or trade. These are just general guidelines.

Examples of popular/substantive trade publications include Architecture Today, Pharmacy Times, or The Economist. Examples of scholarly trade publications include the Journal of Academic Librarianship and the Journal of Educational Computing Research.

In the next section we learn more about popular and scholarly resources, and how to tell the difference. But first, a note about trade publications. “Trade” refers to a job or field of work. When used to describe a resource, trade generally refers to an entire publication (not just an article) written about a particular trade. Articles in trade publications are typically written by practitioners, for practitioners — that is, they are written by people practicing their trade, for other people practicing their trade.

A single trade publication may include some popular and scholarly articles, or lean towards one over the other. However, it is important to evaluate an article’s merits, determining whether it is popular or scholarly, instead of assuming a trade publication includes only one type. They may share general news, trends, practical advice, opinions, or research. Authors may be PhDs using sophisticated language, practitioners using jargon, or editorial staff using layman’s terms. Some articles may provide the author’s credentials and lists of references, while others may include only one or the other, or neither. Some trade publications appear glossy, like a magazine, and some look more like a traditional journal. In fact, some people call them either trade magazines or trade journals.

The bottom line is that if something is called trade, the article could be trade-popular or trade-scholarly. Suppose you are unsure whether your resource is a trade publication. In that case, the title may give you a clue: Middle School Teacher is written for middle school teachers, Advertising Age is written for people in the advertising field, and Pharmacy Times is written for people working in pharmacies or the pharmaceutical industry.

DETERMINING WHAT TYPE OF SOURCE YOU HAVE

Don’t confuse primary and secondary sources with popular and scholarly sources. Think of primary and secondary sources in terms of the author — did the author experience the event they are writing about or write with first-hand knowledge of the research they conducted?

Think of popular and scholarly sources in terms of the audience and content. An article that reviews and summarizes multiple research studies would be a secondary source. If the article is written for scholars or researchers in a field and lists numerous references, it is categorized a scholarly secondary source. If the article is aimed at the general public, it would be a popular secondary source.

Another misconception is that scholarly sources are better than popular sources. While that is sometimes true, popular means it is written in a way easily understood by most readers. For example, an article titled “Fossil Moon,” published in the October 2017 issue of Scientific American, discussed a study about oxygen that comes from Earth to the moon. The gist of the article was that studying lunar soil could tell us more about Earth’s atmospheric history. This concise two-page summary was written for an educated but non-specialist reader. In contrast, when the study was published in the January 2017 issue of Nature Astronomy, the in-depth scholarly article used complicated jargon and a lengthy bibliography. Both discuss the same thing, but one is a shorter easy-to-understand summary, while the other is a lengthy complicated piece.

Following are a few more examples:

Secondary & Scholarly Article

The following article is a synthesis of literature (secondary) on managing stress at work, published in a peer-reviewed (scholarly) journal.

Primary & Trade Article

The following article provides information for individuals in the field of energy and sustainability, making it a trade publication. However, it is also a report on original research, which makes it a primary source.

Primary & Scholarly Article

The following is a report on research done by the author. It is published in Observational Studies, an open-access, scholarly peer-reviewed journal. Since the author conducted the research themself, it is considered primary.

Primary & Popular Book

Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave is a primary and popular book. This book is an autobiography (primary) written for the general public (popular).

Primary & Popular Webpage

This webpage presents an eyewitness (primary) newspaper account (popular) of challenges for university students with disabilities.

Secondary & Scholarly Book

Here is an example of a secondary & scholarly book. The Computer: A Brief History of the Machine That Changed the World is a book detailing the history of the invention of the computer with footnotes and a bibliography. The language used is suited to an educated audience, and the authors are faculty members in the History Department and the School of Computing at Weber State University.

Secondary & Popular Book

The Northern Navajo Frontier 1860-1900: Expansion through Adversity, written by Robert S. McPherson for the general public (popular), pulled information from many sources (secondary) to present an account of the Navajo Nation from 1860-1900.

Secondary & Trade Book

The Business Guide; or Safe Methods of Business, by J. L. Nichols, is a book that provides instruction on all things business. This source compiles business advice from notable business men of the day (secondary). The intended audience is individuals interested in pursuing the business (trade).

Primary & Popular Book

Works of fiction are considered primary sources. To Kill a Mockingbird is the fictional creation of Harper Lee (primary) and is written for the general public (popular).

Primary & Neither Popular or Scholarly

Some sources, such as interviews, diaries, and photographs are primary sources if they are created at the time of the event but are not considered either popular or scholarly. The photograph below depicts a farmhouse in Dalhart, Texas surrounded by sand dunes.

A NOTE ABOUT SCHOLARLY & PEER REVIEW

Most scholarly articles are also peer-reviewed, so terms are often used interchangeably. However, they do not mean the same thing. As noted previously, a publication is regarded as scholarly if it is authored by experts, for experts. Its focus is academic, often reporting original research (experimentation) or theory. Publishers of scholarly works are typically professional associations or academic presses. However, while it can be assumed that all peer-reviewed articles are scholarly, not all scholarly articles are peer-reviewed.

In addition to being written by experts and published in scholarly journals, peer-reviewed articles must go through a rigorous assessment before publication. They are examined and evaluated by the author’s peers (experts in the same subject area), who may make recommendations to improve the quality of the article or even recommend against publication if it is not up to the expected standard. In some cases, the review is a “blind” or “double-blind” peer review — in these cases, the reviewers don’t know who wrote the article, the author doesn’t know who reviewed it, or both. Peer-reviewed periodicals publish articles only if they have passed through this official editorial process. The peer review and evaluation system intends to safeguard, maintain, and improve the quality of the scholarly articles published in academic journals.