Appendix K EBP Project Peer Evaluation and Contributions

Peer Evaluation and Contributions Form

Directions: Evaluation your peers below. Be sure to include their name, answering each question with rationales/explanations, and assign a contribution score. A score of zero would be equivalent with never showing up, contributing nothing, and not being present. A score of 10 would mean the individual contributed what would be reasonable and expected for any student to contribute.

Group member #1’s name:
  1. Did this group member complete assigned tasks?

YES

NO

If no,  you must explain what was not completed? Explain below.

 

 

Explanation:

 

 
  1. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. Overall, how would you rank this person’s contributions to the group?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. Would you want to work with this person again?

Yes

No

If no,  you must explain below.

Explanation:

 

 

Your assigned student Contribution Score out of 10 points (scale of 0-10)

 

Points:

 

Group member #2’s name:
  1. Did this group member complete assigned tasks?

YES

NO

If no, you must explain what was not completed? Explain below.

 

 

Explanation:

 

 
  1. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. Overall, how would you rank this person’s contributions to the group?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. Would you want to work with this person again?

Yes

No

If no,  you must explain below.

Explanation:

 

 

Your assigned student Contribution Score out of 10 points (scale of 0-10)

 

Points:

 

Group member #3’s name:
  1. Did this group member complete assigned tasks?

YES

NO

If no, you must explain what was not completed? Explain below.

 

 

Explanation:

 

 
  1. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. Overall, how would you rank this person’s contributions to the group?

Above average

Average

Below average
  1. Would you want to work with this person again?

Yes

No

If no,  you must explain below.

Explanation:

 

 

Your assigned student Contribution Score out of 10 points (scale of 0-10)

 

Points:

Explanation of how grading works:

You will receive full points if you comprehensively complete this form. Instructor (and mentors, if needed), will review the evaluations of your group members. If, for example, a group member receives scores of 9/10, 10/10, 6/10, 9/10, and 10/10, the average will be taken from these scores (in this case, it would be 8.8). This means that the member’s group felt the individual group member only contributed 88% (and not 100%) and would likely receive 88% of the total grade EBP Project. If the project, for example, received 100%, the individual that only contributed 8.8 would receive 88% while the others may receive 100%. However, I will likely drop any low outliers, so would throw out the one 6/10 score. This helps to prevent individual bias toward a group member.

Further, if an individual deems him/herself on the self-evaluation as having contributed fairly and the majority of group members scored the individual as having contributed far below equity, this will be taken into consideration and a final grade will be awarded with this in mind. Be sure you are honest and transparent with your self-evaluations.

 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Evidence-Based Practice & Research Methodologies Copyright © by Tracy Fawns is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book